Are Thirty Minute Music Lessons OK? 30 Minute Music Lessons

This is a very common question and something that is extremely important when it comes to music lessons. Whether it’s for budgeting or attention issues, the idea of a shorter lesson can be intriguing to many parents.

If you find yourself thinking, “I’m not sure my child can even pay attention for thirty minutes”, then it’s probably best you don’t have them take music lessons until they are older. If they can’t be attentive with someone guiding their work for thirty minutes, then how can you expect them to practice on their own? It’s probably best to hold off on lessons for the near future and come back to it when they are ready. There isn’t some magic age at which children are ready for music lessons but if they are old enough to go to school and do homework on their own, they could be ready for music lessons with a private teacher.

There are always some exceptions to the rule. If you have a young child starting lessons then maybe thirty minutes is the best option – or better yet having two thirty minute lessons each week. It’s also important to have personal involvement with them outside the lesson and help them through their practice sessions. Once they are of school age and can handle homework, you probably won’t need to sit in with them on a regular basis. It’s also important to be encouraging to them; don’t fret over simple mistakes as learning and practicing music should be an enriching experience and you want to avoid harsh discipline.

Another concern for some parents is that longer than thirty minutes could be too intense for some children. The truth is, it’s exactly the opposite! Let’s say you have a student who has issues with something like rhythm or hand position and it’s going to take some time to resolve. As a teacher, having a shorter timeframe to fix something like this will produce a much more hectic and frantic environment in which you are racing against the clock.

When it comes to thirty-minute lessons, there is not much time to achieve anything other than correcting wrong notes and assigning new material. It’s not until you get into 45-60 minute lessons where you can actually begin to analyze and explore the finer points of technique and study music theory. The longer lesson also allows for the teacher and student to build a better rapport with one-another which enhances the learning environment. After all, the most important part of a music lesson is the time you are not with the student – the independent practice time at home.

Your job as a teacher is to show the student what to do on a daily basis that will improve their playing – how to practice. You can’t be there every day so the little time you have must be spent teaching them how to work on their own. In this sense, the most important part of a student’s week is the time they spend away from their teacher. If a student can learn to work on their own and improve through self-correction and productive practice techniques, this is the mark of a very effective teacher.

So why are thirty-minute lessons so popular? It’s simple economics. Most music teachers will advertise cheap lessons as a way to get people interested. After all, a $25 lesson sounds a lot better on your wallet than a $50 lesson each week. The truth is, thirty-minute lessons are most often a compromise.

Many top teachers will offer lessons longer than thirty minutes. Some of them might even insist on longer lessons. Remember that the quality of the teacher is paramount in providing a better learning experience. You might pay a little more but the results could be well worth the extra time and money.

Thanks again for joining me Robert Estrin Robert@LivingPianos.com (949) 244-3729