Welcome to Living Pianos! I’m Robert Estrin. It often feels like all concert pianists were child prodigies, but is that really the case? I had the privilege of studying with Ruth Slenczynska, a remarkable concert pianist often regarded as one of the greatest child prodigies since Mozart. Ruth began performing concerts at the age of four and continued to perform brilliantly into her nineties. Her story is a testament to the possibilities that early training can offer. But are there any concert pianists who were not child prodigies?
Notable Pianists Who Started Later
Interestingly, several renowned concert pianists did not start as child prodigies. Jorge Bolet, for example, was always musically inclined but did not gain widespread recognition in his youth. Another extraordinary pianist, Sviatoslav Richter, while musically talented as a child, achieved fame later in life. Giovanni Bellucci, an Italian concert pianist, started his piano studies at 14 and went on to become a notable performer, demonstrating that late starters can also thrive.
The Importance of Musical Exposure
As a teacher, I’ve noticed that older beginners who have prior musical experience—whether from another instrument or singing—often adapt more quickly to the piano. Even exposure to music at home can significantly enhance one’s ability to learn later on. Music is, after all, a language, and growing up with it can be a considerable advantage, though not a strict necessity.
Historical Perspectives
Historically, many great musicians, like Mozart and Mendelssohn, were indeed child prodigies. However, figures such as Hector Berlioz, who lacked formal training in his youth, remind us that exceptional musical talent can emerge regardless of when one starts. The key takeaway is this: if you’re beginning your musical journey later in life, don’t be discouraged. The odds are not stacked against you. With dedication, hard work, and a genuine passion for the piano, anything is possible. Embrace the journey, and let your love for music guide you. I’m Robert Estrin here at LivingPianos.com, Your Online Piano Store. Thanks for joining me, and I’ll see you next time!
For premium videos and exclusive content, you can join my Living Pianos Patreon channel!www.Patreon.com/RobertEstrin
Contact me if you are interested in private lessons. I have many resources for you! Robert@LivingPianos.com
5 thoughts on “Were All Concert Pianists Child Prodigies?”
I took my first piano lesson at 70 having little prior exposure. My wonderful teacher has patiently guided my slow and steady progress. I can now play simple tunes ( level 3-4) for my great enjoyment as a 75 year old pianist. I hope to play until I die
That’s great to hear. Expanding your repertoire can help you keep growing. It also keeps your mind sharp!
2024.10.22
Dear Robert,
I have been on a lifelong quest to correct those who say “child prodigy.”
Wikipedia says “child prodigy,” the NYT says “child prodigy,” etc. but they are WRONG.
A prodigy IS a child, usually under age 10, with extraordinary ability in some endeavor.
So with all due respect, and you do know I highly respect you,
when you say a “child prodigy,” you are being redundant.
Sincerely,
Charlie in Albuquerque
I believe the term is used for children who have prodigious talent and accomplishment beyond what most children have at an instrument.
Hi Charlie in Albuquerque,
I’m sure you are finding plenty of opportunities to enjoy your self-assigned lifelong quest! 🙂 My particular self-assigned lifelong quest is to correct those who say “help but” — i.e. “I can’t help but think that … ” (my mother was an English teacher).
The correct form is either:
“I cannot but think that … ” or
“I cannot help thinking that … ”
When a person who, as a child, is prodigious (or, a prodigy) grows into adulthood, they are still prodigious (or, a prodigy) — only they are no longer a child. Perhaps both forms of the term have their applicability with not one being applicable to the exclusion of the other – ?